.com Forum · Alpha Dog Forum
Replies in this thread : 28
Page : 1 2
<< prev page next page >>
Comet Poodles Premium Member Posts : 500+ |
I would not mind a hard or partial reset. But some breeds will always reach 100 before others and we'll continue on this cycle. There is no winning here. |
||
Halcyon Design Basic User Posts : 473 |
That is true |
||
Wuppet Kennel Basic User Posts : 15 |
I've been a way for a while, but am back now. Couldn't the breeds that need resetting ber reset, while leaving the other breeds alone? |
||
Marquetry Basic User Posts : 173 |
I had thought when this current reset was done that it was supposed to be set up so that 10s would be very difficult to obtain and a 100 SOP nearly impossible. Wasn't it supposed to be based on an average of all the dogs in the game or group or something like that? At any rate, that idea apparently didn't pan out. If no further reset is coming, and you don't see the point in playing a breed that's all 100s -- I'd think that would be very frustrating -- there are always tons of other breeds available that aren't 100 or too near it. |
||
Star Shiine Basic User Posts : 262 |
I also feel that when a breed reaches 100% that it should be re-set, not all breeds. The users in a 100% breed has nowhere else to go anyway, and they would be able to stay in the breeds if they wanted to. To re-set all breeds would be very unfair to those struggling to improve low % breeds. Just my two penniworth |
||
Druid Basic User Posts : 34 |
After the last reset, I remember Jeff stating that there wouldn't be another reset. What would happen instead would be another decimal point being shown. So instead of 10.0, the dogs could be anywhere between 9.95-10.04. The dogs that are 100 could end up being 99.50. |
||
DoggyPanache Premium Member Posts : 320 |
Just got 100 Golden Retriever, lots of 100 Great Danes |
||
ESAN Basic User Posts : 460 |
quoteI wish that could happen already! The Great Danes are really sad for not knowing their second decimals ( |
Replies in this thread : 28
Post Reply |